SATYAPAL SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/643/2025 · 2025-03-02
Deepak Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11327 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11327 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30617 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 643 of 2025 Applicant :- Satyapal Sharma And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Sakir,Shailendra Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P./opposite party no.1 and perused the record.
2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicants to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants in the event of apprehension of their arrest by the police of Police Station- Manjhola, District- Moradabad in pursuance of the cognizance/summoning order dated 11.3.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, court no. 5, Moradabad in Criminal Case No. 5763 of 2023, under sections 420, 408 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Manjhola, District-Moradabad, during the pendency of trial.
3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail applications of the applicants expeditiously..
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.
5. Accordingly, the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.
6. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if applicants surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and apply for regular bail, their bail applications shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation and Another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC
922.
7. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned Court below, whichever is earlier, non-bailable warrant issued against the applicants, shall be kept in abeyance.
8. With the above observations and directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Faridul Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad