Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113264 (MAD)

S.MUNIYAMMAL v. The State Rep by, The Superintendent of Police,

HCP/2105/2025 · 2025-10-23

M Jothiraman, N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

H.C.P.No.2105 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.10.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN H.C.P.No.2105 of 2025 S.Muniyammal ... Petitioner Versus 1.State Rep by The Superintendent of Police Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District 2. State Rep by The Deputy Superintendent of Police Cheyyar Thiruvannamalai District 3.State Rep by The Inspector of Police Vandavasi North Police Station Thiruvannamalai District 4.Vasantharaj 5.Vengadesan .. Respondents PRAYER: Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.2105 of 2025 of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corupus, directing the 3rd respondent Police to produce the petitioner's daughter minor namely Ms.Sanjana, daughter of Mr.Seenu, aged about 16 years, before this Court from the custody of the fourth respondent and handover to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Appaswamee For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran for R1 to R3 Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) The petitioner seeks for a direction to the 3rd respondent Police to produce the petitioner's daughter minor namely Ms.Sanjana, daughter of Mr.Seenu, aged about 16 years, before this Court from the custody of the fourth respondent and handover to the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is the mother of detenue aged about 16 years. It is the grievance of the petitioner that from 29.09.2025, her daughter has not returned to her house, hence, she has given a complaint. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the detenue though aged about 16 years has eloped with the fourth respondent, in this regard, FIR is filed in Cr.No.156/2025 on the file of the third respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.2105 of 2025 4. Such view of the matter, we are of the view let the respondent police secure the minor girl and produce before the jurisdictional magistrate. 5. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of. No costs. (N.S.K., J.) (M.J.R., J.) 23.10.2025 dhk Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No To, 1. The Superintendent of Police Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Cheyyar Thiruvannamalai District 3.The Inspector of Police Vandavasi North Police Station Thiruvannamalai District N. SATHISH KUMAR, J. and M. JOTHIRAMAN, J. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.2105 of 2025 dhk 4. The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court. H.C.P.No.2105 of 2025 23.10.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis