Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11326 (JHR)

BIJAY KUMAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3266/2025 · 2025-04-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:12630] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3266 of 2025 ------ Bijay Kumar Paswan aged about – 26 years, S/O Mehndi Hajra, R/o- Lorighaghar, P.O- Satpahri, P.S.- Taljhari, District- Dumka .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Onkar Nath Tewary, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Snehlika Bhagat, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-28-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hansdiha P.S. Case No.77 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 305/331(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of theft in the house of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has been transpired on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.11.2024 as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co-accused person, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.04.2025 passed in B.A. No.2863 of 2025. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Dumka in connection with Hansdiha P.S. Case No.77 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/