HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 44583 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Nilesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the applicants, Ms. Namrata Saxena, Advocate holding brief of Shri Shashi Shekhar Maurya, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Shri Radhey Shyam, learned AGA for the State. 3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings, including proceedings of Criminal Case No.945 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No.27 of 2024, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Kheta Sarai, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Jaunpur, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same has been filed along with the supplementary affidavit which is on the record. It is further submitted that there is a cross case also and in that case compromise has been arrived at between the parties. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anand Kumar, Mukesh Sharma, Nilesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Bhriguram Ji, G.A., Ranu, Shashi Shekhar Maurya Manoj Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned charge-sheets/cognizance- summoning order and entire proceedings of Case Crime No.27 of 2024, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Kheta Sarai, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Jaunpur, against the applicants, are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. September 10, 2025 RKM A482 No. 44583 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad