COCP-70 178 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Ashok Manoj Kumar, IAS, Director General CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : HARKESH MANUJA, submits that the on 20.03.2025 by the officer concerned and in case his documents are found in order, he shall be granted appointment/ joining within two weeks thereafter. 2. not press the present petition. 3. 4. 5. stand disposed of 6. aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would 702-2025 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. Date of Decision: VERSUS Manoj Kumar, IAS, Director General CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Mr. D.R. Singla, Advocate for Mr. R.P. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the that the petitioner has been called for document 20.03.2025 by the officer concerned and in case his documents are found in order, he shall be granted appointment/ joining within two weeks thereafter. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if an stand disposed of. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 702-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.03.2025 ...Petitioner Manoj Kumar, IAS, Director General ...Respondent HARKESH MANUJA . Singla, Advocate for Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. earned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, petitioner has been called for documents verification 20.03.2025 by the officer concerned and in case his documents are found in order, he shall be granted appointment/ joining within two learned counsel for the petitioner does . Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would respondents, on instructions, verification 20.03.2025 by the officer concerned and in case his documents are found in order, he shall be granted appointment/ joining within two learned counsel for the petitioner does y, shall also However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would SANJAY GUPTA 2025.03.12 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document COCP-70 be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/ petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 11.03.2025 sanjay 702-2025 (O&M) [2] be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 11.03.2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE g/reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first SANJAY GUPTA 2025.03.12 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document