SARITA W/O SHRI VIJAY SINGH v. SMT. GAYATRI A. RATHORE
CCP/289/2025 · 2025-09-04
Ganesh Ram Meena
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11325 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11325 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35520] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 289/2025 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.588/2025 Sarita W/o Shri Vijay Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Sulkhaniya Chota, Churu, District Churu (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, Principal Secretary To The Government, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. Dr. S.S. Agarwal, Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jhalana Institutional Area, Near Doordarshan Kendra, Jaipur 302004 (Rajasthan)
4. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Contemnor-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 04/09/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the direction of the Court, the comtemnor- respondents have decided the representation submitted by the petitioner. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is disposed of as the impugned order has already been complied with.
[2025:RJ-JP:35520] (2 of 2) [CCP-289/2025] However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available to him so as to challenge the order passed on representation, if he has any grievance.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /24