Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11321 (UTT)

VIPIN PAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1019/2024 · 2025-03-18

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1019 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation, final report has been submitted against the petitioners, who are named in the FIR impugned in the present writ petition. 4. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided by this Court. Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 18.03.2025 AK