IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 21250/2025 Decided on: 06.01.2026 Gurmit Singh …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Pankaj Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Sidharth Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ramesh Chand Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Kumar, learned vice counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2, respectively. 2. Petitioner is seeking applicability of The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025 2 3. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievance raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring his representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The instant petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 06th January, 2026(rohit)