Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113166 (ALL)

SMT. SHILPI MALL ALIAS SHILPI SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLR/6683/2024 · 2025-09-16

Harvir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6683 of 2024 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 and perused the material on record. 2. The present revision has been filed against the order dated 19.09.2024 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Kasya, Kushinagar, in Final Report No. 143/2023, arising out of Case Crime No. 390/2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 471, 409 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Hata, District Kushinagar, whereby learned Judicial Magistrate, Kasya, Kushinagar has accepted the Final Report No. B99/2022 and rejected the protest application of the revisionist on dated 20.05.2023. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he did not press the protest petition before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kasya, Kushinagar. Learned counsel for the revisionist has further submitted that the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kasya, Kushinagar, is liable to be set aside. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 has submitted that the revisionist herein by her volition and free will has preferred not to press the protest petition and the same has been dismissed on the basis of not being pressed. 5. As it is evident from the order passed by the learned Judicial Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shivendu Ojha Smt. Shilpi Mall Alias Shilpi Singh .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Magistrate, Kasya, Kushinagar, no other reason has been assigned in respect of the said protest petition, expect that the revisionist did not intend to press the said protest petition and the same was dismissed accordingly. 6. There is no ground to interfere in the present revision, hence, the present revision is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. September 17, 2025 Vikram CRLR No. 6683 of 2024 2 (Harvir Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad