1 2025:CGHC:11204 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 319 of 2025 1. Ghanshyam Agrawal S/o Dhaniram Agrawal Aged About 65 Years R/o Premnagar, P.S. And Tehsil Premnagar, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Inspector, Police Station Kotwali Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate For Non-applicant : Ms. Supriya Upasane , Govt. Advocate SB: Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 06.03.2025 1. This second bail application on behalf of applicant under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. First application bearing M.Cr.C.(A) No.1473/2014 has been rejected on merits by this Court vide order dated 20.12.2024. 2. The applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.595/2024 registered at Police Station NISHA DUBEY Digitally signed by NISHA DUBEY Date: 2025.03.07 16:35:58 +0530 2 Kotwali, Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336 (3) & 340 (2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. Case of prosecution, in brief, is that the Tahsildar, Ambikapur lodged written complaint in concerned police station to the effect that while dealing with application filed by applicant and other co-accused persons for execution of the orders passed by the revenue Courts, it has been found that the orders which are sought to be executed, are forged. Based on the said complaint, the police registered the instant crime against accused persons including present appellant. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Referring to the medical documents of the applicant, which are placed along with this bail applicant, he submits that applicant being a senior citizen aged about 65 years of age, is suffering from various health problems that requires constant care and treatment. He is also required to undergo cataract surgery. Co-accused Ashok Agrawal has already been enlarged on bail on medical ground vide order dated 30.1.2025 passed in M.Cr.C. (A) No.137/2025. Hence, he prays that the 3 applicant be also extended benefit of anticipatory bail on the ground of parity. 5. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposed the bail application of present applicant. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 7. Perusal of record of bail application reveals that the merits of the matter have already been considered while rejecting first bail application of application vide order dated 20.12.2024. This second bail application is filed mainly on medical ground. On perusal of the medical documents of applicant filed along with this application, it is apparent that the applicant is not having any serious ailment which may be said to be a good ground for bail on medical condition. 8. Accordingly, in absence of any new ground, this second anticipatory bail application is rejected. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE nisha