YASMEEN AKHTER(LADAKH CASE) v. UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH AND ORS. (GENERAL ADMINISTRATION)
WP(C)/1865/2024 · 2025-05-05
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11311 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11311 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 84 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1865/2024 YASMEEN AKHTER …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI with M/S Faizan, CGC and Bisma, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE
ORDER 05.05.2025 There is none present on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. T. M. Shamsi, learned DSGI submits that as per the report received by him from Additional Deputy Commissioner, Kargil, Ladakh, selection of respondent no.4 has been challenged under Roll No. 37868, but no such candidate with such name is registered with such Roll Number with such selection. Since as reported by Mr. T.M. Sham, DSI, no such person has been selected having such Roll Number, therefore, this writ petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 05.05.2025
“Imtiyaz” Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 07.05.2025 15:06