APHC010129662019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5699/2019 Between: 1. SMT.A.SATYAVATHI,, W/O.K.SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT- 49 YEARS, OCC- EX-ANGANWADI WORKER, R/O.VADDIPA VILLAGE, ROLEGUNTA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, LARGE CENTER, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE OF ANGANWADI WORKERS AND HELPERS, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR ICDS PROJECT, CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, NARSIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5699 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned letter No.15/2019, DT-26-03- 2019 issued by the 5th respondent removing the petitioner herein from the post of Anganwadi Worker, Vaddipa Anganwadi Center, Narsipatnam ICDS Project Area, Visakhapatnam District as arbitrary, illegal against Art.14, 16 AND 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th respondent to continue the petitioner as Anganwadi Worker, Vaddipa Anganwadi Center, Narsipatnam ICDS Project Area, Visakhapatnam District and pass…” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Women and Child Welfare Department is in attendance. 3. None appeared for the petitioner. No fresh vakalat filed for the writ petitioner. 4. It appears that the writ petitioner did not come forward to prosecute the petition, though the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. 5. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 16.07.2025 Pmk 4 22 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:5699 OF 2019 Date: 16.07.2025 Pmk