Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11308 (MAD)

CEAT FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. v. ASHOK KUMAR GOEL

OP/296/2000 · 2025-07-30

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

O.P.No.296 of 2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.07.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE O.P.No.296 of 2000 Ceat Financial Services Limited ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Ashok Kumar Goel 2.Sri Rama Machinery Corporation Limited ... Respondents Prayer: Original Petition is filed under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint an Arbitrator on behalf of the Respondents in respect of the Petitioner's claim for amounts due and for the vehicle TN-01-J- 4752 under Hire Purchase Agreeement No.03-07-0009-95/96 dated 19.05.95. For Petitioner : No appearance ORDER This Original Petition is of the year 2000. 2. On the last hearing date, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to verify as to whether anything survives for adjudication in this Original Petition. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.P.No.296 of 2000 ABDUL QUDDHOSE , J. arb 3. Today, when this matter is taken up, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can be now inferred that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing with the remedy in this Original Petition. Hence, this Original Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 30.07.2025 Neutral Citation : Yes / No arb O.P.No.296 of 2000 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis