[2025:RJ-JP:17903] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13860/2013 1. Murarilal Meena son of Shri Bajranglal Meena, aged about 25 years, resident of VPO Harsoda, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 2. Dilbag Meena son of Shri Ramesh Chand Meena, resident of Village Dhiraria ka Por, Pot Dhigaria Bheem, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 3. Vishwanath Meena son of Shri Harikesh Meena, resident of Village Motipura, Post Bhartun, Tehsil Sapotara, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. 2. Ventral Industrial Security Force through its Director, 13, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi. 3. Commandant/Chairman, Central Industrial Security Force, 5th RB Gaziabad PO Shipra Sun City, Gaziabad (UP). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 28/04/2025 1. The matter has been called twice today but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. 2. This Court has examined record of the writ petition and has also heard learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has indicated that in the writ petition, petitioner has prayed for declaring the result of Skill Test (Typing and Stenography Test) of the petitioner and in case, [2025:RJ-JP:17903] (2 of 2) [CW-13860/2013] he is found eligible then may be given appointment on the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (Stenographer) pursuant to advertisement Annexure-1. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has drawn attention of this Court towards reply to the writ petition in which respondents have clarified that the result of skill test was already declared by the respondents in which the petitioner could not succeed; however, a decision was taken by the respondents at their own and with the sole intention to recruit skilled persons in respondent-Department, to grant a second opportunity to the candidates, who remained unsuccessful in first round of skill test. 5. As per learned counsel for the respondents, thereupon, the respondent-Department has imparted training to such unsuccessful candidates at the cost of the Department and after completion of training, again skill test was conducted in which also even in second round of skill test, the petitioner could not succeed. 6. In the light of above discussions, no cause of action to pursue the instant writ petition survives and the instant writ petition is hereby dismissed. 7. Stay application as well as all pending applications stands dispose of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/205