AINE RANA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/2071/2022 · 2025-12-02
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112960 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112960 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision : December 02, 2025
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Pardeep K. Bhawra, Advocate, for Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Saurabh Singla, Advocate, for Mr. T.S. Attariwala, Advocate for the respondents No.3 to 5. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.3 to 5 submits that the instant writ petition has become infructuous, as the additional fee charged from the petitioners has already been refunded.
2. In view of the submission (supra), the instant writ petition is d
(KULDEEP TIWARI) December 02, 2025
JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2025.12.02 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment