Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30942 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2503 of 2025 Applicant :- Sachin Bind Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pradeep Kumar Mishra,Ved Prakash Mishra Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Learned AGA has informed that the notice to the informant has been served on 23.1.2025 3. Heard Sri Rajendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Mohit Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 4. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 263 of 2024, under Section 137(2), 65(1) of B.N.S and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, 2012, Police Station Khetasarai, District Jaunpur, during the pendency of trial. 5. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have enticed away the minor daughter of the informant on 22.11.2024 at about 9:30 am. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR is delayed by about 24 days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. The victim has stated that she knew the applicant and had gone to meet him from her native place and she has not raised any alarm during her travel to Patiala. In her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, she has stated that she was forced to marry the applicant and was subjected to forceful corporeal relationship. The victim by her looks seems to be major, although she is stated to be 16 years old. The applicant is a youth of 22 years. 7. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against him. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicant have also been touched upon at length. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 21.12.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 8. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 9. The Supreme Court in the case of Niranjan Singh and another vs. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote and Others, AIR 1980 SC 785 has avoided detailed examination of the evidence and elaborate documentation of the merits of the case as no party should have the impression that his case has been prejudiced. A prima facie satisfaction of case is needed but it is not the same as an exhaustive exploration of the merits in the order itself. 10. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and taking into consideration the settled law of the Supreme Court passed in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors., 2022 INSC 690 and Manish Sisodia vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 INSC 595 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 11. Let the applicant- Sachin Bind, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence. (ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 B.N.S.S. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 12. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 13. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. Order Date :- 4.3.2025/ S.K.S. (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad