Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 112959 (ALL)

IMRAN AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/44671/2024 · 2025-01-20

Dinesh Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10850 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 44671 of 2024 Applicant :- Imran And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Arvind Kumar Mishra,Devendra Mishra,G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applicants have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No.99 of 2024 (State of U.P. Vs. Imran and others), arising out of Case Crime No.080 of 2023, under Sections 147, 323, 352, 506, 308 IPC, Police Station Sikandrabad, District Bulandshahar, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Bulandshahar as well as charge sheet dated 16.06.2023 and summoning order dated 03.01.2024. 3. After due deliberation at length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that he is not pursuing the instant application on merits. He has further submitted that the present applicants are willing and ready to co-operate with the courts below and participate in the court proceedings provided some protection may be granted to them. It is next submitted that the present applicants have never intended to ignore the court proceedings. 4. Learned AGA has no objection if protection is granted to the present applicants to enable them to appear before the court below. 5. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present application, without making any observation on the merits of the case as mentioned in the present application, with a direction that the present applicants, in case, appear/surrender and move a bail application before the court below within a period of three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the court concerned in the light of the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 Supreme Court Cases 773 expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three weeks thereafter. 6. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicants. 7. As such, instant application is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Mini Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad