Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb.Application Nos.43 to 45 of 2025 Axis Bank Ltd. ..Applicant in all the applications Vs Madan Subbian Pandithan ..Respondent in Arb.Appln.No.43/2025 Swapnil Hanamant Gurav ..Respondent in Arb.Appln.No.44/2025 Madan Subbian Pandithan ..Respondent in Arb.Appln.No.45/2025 For Applicants: Mr.Uma Vijayan M.R.
COMMON ORDER This Court, by its earlier order dated 17.03.2025, made it clear that if the vehicle is not repossessed before the next hearing date, these applications will be closed on the next hearing date. On the last hearing date, the time was extended for the Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle till the date of next hearing. Till today, the vehicle has not been repossessed by the Advocate Commissioner in accordance with the order dated 17.03.2025. Therefore, these Applications are closed. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an Advocate https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J. Commissioner to repossess the vehicle as and when the vehicle is located. While considering the fresh application, this Court shall consider retaining the very same Advocate Commissioner who has been appointed in these applications since the applicant had already paid the initial remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner.
09.04.2025 vsi Arb.Application Nos.43 to 45 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis