Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11287 (UTT)

RUCHI NAITHANI v. RAHUL NAITHANI

CRLR/612/2025 · 2025-09-22

Pankaj Purohit

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CRLR No.612 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Tejas Agarrwal, Advocate for the revisionist. 2. This criminal revision has been filed by the revisionist, whereby he has put to challenge the order dated 18.08.2025, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kotdwar, Pauri-Garhwal in Criminal Appeal No.25 of 2025, Rahul Naithani Vs. Ruchi Naithani, under Section 29 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, whereby the criminal appeal preferred by the respondent- husband (Rahul Naithani) has been allowed, and after quashing the trial court order dated 22.02.2025, remanded the matter back to the trail court to decide the Misc. Criminal Case No.36 of 2023, in light of the observations made, in the body of the judgment and order dated 18.08.2025. 3. I have gone through the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kotdwar, Pauri-Garhwal. The reasons assigned by the trial court in paragraphs 8 and 9 of the judgment appear sound. Furthermore, as the matter has only been remanded back to the trial court, no interference is required at this stage. 4. Accordingly criminal revision is dismissed in limine. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 22.09.2025 SK