Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:81822 Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47072 of 2024 Applicant :- Vijay Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rahul Singh Dahiya Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant and perused the material brought on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the F.I.R. dated 17.05.2024 was lodged by the informant against the applicant regarding an incident said to have occurred between 16.02.2024 to 26.02.2024 alleging therein that applicant had debit a sum of money to the tune of about twenty lakh rupees by forgery and cheating. Learned counsel further submits that the Branch Manager of the Bank concerned in his statement had clearly stated that on 16.02.2024 and 29.02.2024 the informant himself had submitted two cheques in favour of the applicant by putting her signatures. Thus, learned counsel submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case due to ulterior motive. There is one case into the credit of applicant in which he is on bail. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 15.11.2024. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 5. Let the applicant-Vijay Singh, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 174 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Shikarpur, District- Bulandshahar, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 6. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Mustaqeem. Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad