NANHE LAL v. STATE OF U.P THROUGH ITS SECRETARY REVENUE, LUCKNOW AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/42467/2024 · 2025-07-14
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112822 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112822 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:113749 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42467 of 2024 Petitioner :- Nanhe Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P Through Its Secretary Revenue, Lucknow And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satendra Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sher Bahadur Singh Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 22.07.2024 (Annexure No.6) passed by Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil Bisalpur, District Pilibhit in Appeal No. 1958/2023 computerised case no. T202312560201958 (Nattho Devi @Nando Devi versus Nanhe Lal and Others) under Section 35(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 and kindly also quash the impugned order dated 25.10.2024 (Annexure No.8) passed by the Court of Additional Commissioner (Administration), Bareilly Division, Bareilly in Case No.1365/2024, Computerised Case No. C202412000001365 (Nanhe Lal versus Nattho Devi @ Nando Devi and Others) under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. (iv.) It is most respectfully, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this writ petition and kindly pass an order or issue direction in nature of mandamus for expedite hearing of case no. 15333 of 2025 (Nanhe Lal and Others versus Puttu Lal) under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code pending before the Court of Nayab Tehsildar II, Tehsil Bisalpur, District Pilibhit within a stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset states that he is not pressing the prayer (i) made in the writ petition and is confined only to the prayer (iv). 3. This Court on 02.07.2025 had required Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General to get instructions from State Government as to why petitions in such a large number are being filed in this Court for expediting mutation proceedings. 4. Pursuant to query made by this Court, learned Additional
Advocate General placed before the Court the circular issued by State Government on 09.07.2025 wherein a direction has been issued by State Government to all Collectors of the State requiring Tehsildars and Sub Divisional Officers of the Tehsil and Division to conclude the mutation proceedings within the time period prescribed under the Code. 5.
This Court requires that each and every Tehsildar and Sub Divisional Officer of the State should immediately comply the directions issued by State Government and in case the mutation applications are kept pending and are not decided within the time frame as provided under the Circular dated 09.07.2025 or as provided under the Code, 2006 or directed by this Court, it would amount to civil contempt under Section 2(e) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Without any further direction, the officer will be held disobedient of the order of this Court and would be guilty of contempt. 6. In view of said fact, the authority concerned is hereby directed to conclude the proceedings of Mutation Case No.15333 of 2025 (Nanhe Lal and Others versus Puttu Lal) positively within a period of three months, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law, after hearing all the affected parties. 7. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Kushal Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad