Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11278 (MAD)

A.NATESAN v. THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

CRL OP/614/2025 · 2025-01-10

P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.614 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.01.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.614 of 2025 A.Natesan ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Natrampalli Police Station Vellore District Crime No.495 of 2013 ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to issue direction to dispose of the S.C.No.40 of 2024 pending on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Tirupathur as expeditiously as possible with in the period of stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.614 of 2025 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue direction to dispose of the S.C.No.40 of 2024 pending on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Tirupathur as expeditiously as possible within a stipulated time. 2. It would be appropriate to note that since thousands of cases are pending in the Courts and the litigants are awaiting in a long queue, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi Vs. The State of Maharashtra in Criminal Appeal No.4758 of 2024 dated 25.11.2024 has observed that the High Courts are fixing a time-bound schedule for conclusion of the trials in a routine manner despite the decisions of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2024) 6 SCC 267, which reads as under: 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.614 of 2025 "47.3. constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other courts. Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time-bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending." 3. In view of the above decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court is not inclined to fix any specific time limit. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 10.01.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No ksa-2 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.614 of 2025 To 1. The Principal District and Sessions Court, Tirupathur 2. The Inspector of Police Natrampalli Police Station Vellore District 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.614 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN. J. Ksa-2 Crl.O.P.No.614 of 2025 10.01.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis