SMT. SUMITRA DEVI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/20521/2024 · 2025-02-14
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112776 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112776 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21668 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20521 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Sumitra Devi And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshul Kumar Singhal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.
2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:-
"a) issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.3 not to deduct any amount towards installment of commuted pension from the monthly pension of the petitioners. b). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to refund the excess amount of pension illegally recovered from the petitioner towards '' installment of commuted pension" along with reasonable interest which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper."
3. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that present controversy has already been decided by Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.01.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 17819 of 2024 (Ashok Kumar Agarwal and 48 Others v. Union Of India and another); Neutral Citation No.- 2025:AHC:6439-DB, therefore, this petition may also be dismissed on same terms.
4. Learned counsel for petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by learned Standing Counsel.
5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed in terms of order dated 15.01.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 17819 of 2024.
6. No order as to costs. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Amit Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad