Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 112768 (ALL)

YAMEEN v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/42650/2024 · 2025-03-06

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:33194-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42650 of 2024 Petitioner :- Yameen Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Baleshwar Chaturvedi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard leaned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents and Sri Baleshwar Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has prayed for the following substantial relief: "I. Issue a writ, of Mandamus direct the Respondent Authority for shifting the present transformer from the front of the house just from 3 feet from the sahan darwaja of the petitioner to Pani Tanki of the Nagar Nigam that is only 300 meter distance." 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner agrees to deposit Rs.1000/- which is required as processing fee of shifting in the transformer and also agrees to the condition as laid down by the respondent No.2/Executive Engineer vide its letter dated November 21, 2024. 4. Upon deposit of the aforesaid amount by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 is directed to act in accordance with law and carry out the shift in the transformer within a period of six weeks from the date the money is deposited by the petitioner. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petiton is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 Kuldeep (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad