Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 112757 (ALL)

RAKESH KUMAR AND 9 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/20594/2024 · 2025-02-12

Neeraj Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20791 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20594 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar And 9 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Tripathi,Manoranjan Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel for State- respondents. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "I). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the regularization of the petitioners on the post of Collection Peon under 50% quota under Rule 5 of U.P. Seasonal Collection Peon Rules, 2004, within stipulated period. II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to consider the claim of the petitioners for regularization on the post of Collection Peon which is lying pending before him since long back, within stipulated period." Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that for redressal of their grievance, petitioners have filed representation dated 11.12.2024 before respondent No.3, but no decision has been taken till date. Learned standing counsel submitted that petitioner may be directed to file fresh separate representations before respondent No.3. He further submitted that in case any such representations are filed, the same shall be considered and decided at the earliest. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to move fresh separate representations along with certified copy of this order before respondent No.3 within two weeks from today. In case any such representations are filed, respondent No.3 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law maximum within a period of two months thereafter. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 3 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. Order Date :- 13.2.2025/AKT Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad