Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 112702 (ALL)

BRIJPAL RATHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/43950/2024 · 2025-04-22

Vikas Budhwar

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:61871 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 43950 of 2024 Applicant :- Brijpal Rathi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Babboo Ram Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J. 1. Heard Sri Ambuj Mishra (AOR A/A 0538/2012) holding brief of Sri Babboo Ram, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at bar that though the present application has been preferred for quashing the entire criminal proceeding as well as impugned summoning order dated 10.7.2018 and NBW issued/passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II Gautambudh Nagar in Complaint Case No.4403 of 2018 (Rohit Khari Vs. Brajpal Rathi) under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act Police Station Badalpur District Gautambudh Nagar pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Gautambudh Nagar, however, he confines his relief for consideration of bail. 3. Learned AGA has no objection to the same. 4. Thus, interference is declined and the application is consigned to record. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks direction for consideration of his bail application in light of the judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another; decided on 07.10.2021 in S.L.P. No.5191 of 2021 6. In the opinion of the Court, once a bail application is preferred then the same shall be considered with most expeditions strictly as per the law of the land without any delay. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Rajesh Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad