Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1127 (MAN)

SHRI ANIL ARJUN v. UNION OF INDIA

WP(C)/531/2018 · 2025-08-10

Ahanthem Bimol Singh

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Item No. 50 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 531 of 2018 Shri Anil Arjun Petitioner Vs. Union of India Respondent BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 11.08.2025 Mr. N. Bipin, learned counsel, appeared for the petitioner; and Mr. Kh. Samarjit, learned DSGI, appeared for the respondent. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the uncommunicated ACR/APAR of the petitioner and also the communicated ACR/APAR of the petitioner which has been downgraded by the authorities and the further prayer made by the petitioner is that upon quashing of the said uncommunicated ACR/APAR of the petitioner, his case be considered for promotion for the purpose of availing pensionary benefits. Mr. Kh. Samarjit, learned DSGI appearing for the respondents, submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner has already been promoted to the next higher post and thereafter he has taken voluntary retirement. The learned DSGI submitted that due to subsequent events which occurred after filing of the writ petition, no cause survives for adjudication and the present writ petition can be closed as infructuous. Recording the submission made by the learned DSGI, the present writ petition is hereby closed as infructuous. LAIREN MAYUM INDRAJE ET SINGH Digitally signed by LAIRENMAYUM INDRAJEET SINGH Date: 2025.08.11 15:09:11 +05'30' 2 It is, however, made clear that the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court again if he has any grievances. Registry is directed to return back the sealed cover envelope containing the confidential documents of the petitioner to the learned DSGI during the course of the day. JUDGE Indrajeet