IN TH 205 S.D.O. “O District Jin Bindu CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU 1. against the the suit fil and perman 2. submits tha whether ju 145 of the Hon’ble D ‘Mahesh judgment d RSA-3029-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.3 Date of decision :-06.11.2025 O. “OP” Sub Urban, Sub Divis ict Jind and another Versus AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Varenium Asija, Advocate Mrs. Vasundhra Asija Bhanda for the appellants. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellants/defendants hav st the concurrent findings of the lear uit filed by the respondent/plaintiff ermanent injunction has been decreed At the very outset, learned that the question of law involved her jurisdiction of the Civil Court is of the Electricity Act, 2003, has s ’ble Division Bench of this Court in hesh Kumar vs. Sub Divisional O ment dated 14.05.2025. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH l No.3029 of 2025 (O & M) .2025 Division, DHBVN, Narwana, …..Appellants …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA vocate for handari, Advocate have filed the present appeal e learned Courts below whereby intiff for declaration, mandatory ecreed. rned counsel for the appellants olved in the present appeal as to urt is barred in view of Section has since been decided by the urt in RSA-4181-2016, titled as nal Officer and Another’ vide VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.07 18.47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. As per offic respondent 4. present sec plaintiff sta respondent remedy as 5. made in th res judica respondent 6. 7. the respond November Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-3029-2025 (O & M) Vide order dated 02.9.2025 no er office report dated 04.11.2025 notic ndent for want of process fee. However, in view of the fa second appeal is allowed, and the s stands dismissed on the ground of ndent-plaintiff is at liberty to take r dy as available, in accordance with law It is made clear that any evid in the impugned judgments and dec dicata in any subsequent proce nt-plaintiff. Pending application(s), if any, The Registry is directed to sen espondent/plaintiff. ember 06, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 025 notice of motion was issued. 5 notice could not be issued to the the facts mentioned above, the d the suit filed by the respondent- und of jurisdiction. However, the take recourse to the appropriate law. y evidence recorded/observations nd decrees would not operate as proceedings initiated by the if any, shall stands disposed of. to send the copy of this order to ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.07 18.47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document