Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11268 (RAJ)

GORDHAN KHYALIA AND ORS v. U O I FOOD SAFETY ORS

CW/18143/2011 · 2025-01-03

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:314] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18143/2011 1. Gordhan Khyalia, S/o Bhagirathmal, aged 41 years, resident of Laxman Ka Bas, Post Katrathal, Distt. Sikar 2. Suresh Kumar Sharma, S/o Mangilal Sharma, aged 40 years, R/o VPO Mota ki Dhani, Tehsil dantaramgarh, Dist. Sikar 3. Hukma Ram, S/o Hanumana Ram, aged 45 years, resident of VPO Tapiplya, Via Reengus, Dist. Sikar 4. Ghan Shyam Sharma, S/o Chaturthi Lal Sharma, aged 52 years, R/o VPO Kansarda, Tehsil Srimadoopur, Dist. Sikar 5. Prakash Chand Sharma, S/o Gopal Sharma, aged 40 years, R/o VPO Bhadwasi, Dist. Sikar ----Petitioners Versus 1. Union of India through Chief Executive Office, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, FDA Bhawan, Kotla Road, New Delhi- 110002 2. Joint Director, Food Safety & Standards Authority of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Ist Floor, East Tower, NBCC Place, Pragati Vihar, New Delhi- 110003 3. State of Raj. Through Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 4. Principal Secretary, Department of Medical and Health, Secretariat, Jaipur 5. Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supply, Secretariat, Jaipur 6. Food Commissioner and Director (Public Health) Medical & Health Services, Govt of Rajasthan, Jaipur 7. Principal Secretary, Department of Law and Legal Affairs, Secretariat, Jaipur 8. Special Secretary, Law cum Joint Legal Remembrancer (JLR) (Drafting) Department of Law and Legal Affairs, Jaipur 9. Chief Medical and Health Officer, Sikar. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanmay Dhand For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:314] (2 of 2) [CW-18143/2011] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 03/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the present petition. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /43