MANDIR SHRI SITAVALLABH JI TRUST v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3759/2025 · 2025-03-20
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11267 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11267 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:12664] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3759/2025 Mandir Shri Sitavallabh Ji Trust, Sirahdyodhi Bazar, Jaipur Through Managing Trustee, Shri Gaurav Sharma, S/o Late Shri Girdhari Lal Sharma ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Jaipur
2. Inspector, Devasthan Department-First, Jaipur.
3. Assistant Commissioner (First), Devasthan Department, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakhar Gupta For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 20/03/2025
1. By way of filing instant civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been made by petitioner to the interlocutory order dated 19.02.2025 passed by the Commissioner (First), Devasthan Department, Jaipur, issuing notices on the review application filed by respondent No.2 for seeking review of final order dated 29.01.2025 passed by Commissioner and simultaneously, the order under review dated 29.01.2025 has also been stayed in the meanwhile.
2. Counsel for petitioner has vehemently argued that the Commissioner (First), Devasthan Department, Jaipur has no
[2025:RJ-JP:12664] (2 of 2) [CW-3759/2025] jurisdiction to review its own order and the review application itself is not maintainable.
3. This Court finds that the Commissioner issued notices of review application and same is still pending before the Commissioner. Indisputably, petitioner has put in appearance before the Commissioner, hence, it is open for the petitioner to raise his factual and legal objections against maintainability and entertaining the review application. No final order by the Commissioner has yet been passed on the review application.
4. It is hereby observed that in case petitioner raises objection on maintainability of review application, same shall be considered and dealt with by the Commissioner in accordance with law, while deciding the review application.
5. With the aforesaid liberty, without interfering with the impugned order, instant writ petition stands disposed of.
6. However, it is hereby directed that the review application pending before the Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Jaipur, shall be heard and decided as early as possible and preferably within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
7. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/7