Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 112658 (ALL)

RAJU v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/20656/2024 · 2025-01-02

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:265 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20656 of 2024 Petitioner :- Raju Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kanhaiya Lal Counsel for Respondent :- Anand Kumar Srivastava,C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Matter is taken up in the revised call. None appears for the respondent No.3. Name of learned counsel for the respondent is shown in the cause list. Heard Shri Kanhaiya Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1, 2-State. The petitioner claims that she is entitled to benefit of bonus, ACP and re-fixation of pay. He has made a representation in this regard but to no avail. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2- State submits that the issue requires determination of facts by the competent authority as per law in the first instance. However, he contends that her claim regarding benefit of Assured Career Progression (ACP), bonus and re-fixation of pay are liable to be decided by the competent authority in a reasonable time frame. In light of the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent No.3-Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, District-Basti shall decide the representation of the petitioner regarding benefit of Assured Career Progression (ACP), bonus and re-fixation of pay as per law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 2.1.2025 Ashish Tripathi Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad