Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11259 (GAU)

MUKAND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS

WP(C)/2224/2023 · 2025-06-04

Michael Zothankhuma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010085912023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2224/2023 MUKAND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR ROYAL ARCADE PART- II B BARUAH ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI 781007 2: RISHI GUPTA S/O LT. RAGHUBIR SINGH GUPTA R/O A.C. DUTTA LANE KUMARPARA GUWAHATI 1 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM THE DIRECTOR OF PETITIONER NO. 1 COMPAN VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REP.BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM BLOCK C 3RD FLOOR ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL DEPTT. ASSAM SCHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL (B) DEPTT. ASSAM SCHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 4:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL (B) DEPTT. ASSAM SCHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 5:THE UNDER SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL (B) DEPTT. ASSAM SCHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (M) Page No.# 2/2 DC OFFICE LICHUBAGAN HENGRABARI GUWAHATI ASSAM 781036 7:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KAMRUP METROPOLITAN GUWAHATI 8:THE CEO E-FT MISSION O/O THE ADGP (BORDER) ASSAM POLICE BORDER HEADQUARTER SRIMANTAPUR BHANGAGRH GUWAHATI 32 9:THE INSPECTOR (E-FT) O/O THE ADGP (BORDER) ASSAM POLICE BORDER HEADQUARTER SRIMANTAPUR BHANGAGRH GUWAHATI 3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A GOYAL, MR. A CHOUDHURY,MR. P DAS Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 05.06.2025 Mr. B. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bills of the petitioner having been paid, the writ petition has become infructuous. He accordingly, prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition. Mr. M. Chetia, learned Government Advocate, Assam is present. The prayer of the petitioner’s counsel is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant