Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11256 (JHR)

SUGAN GIDHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2525/2025 · 2025-06-11

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:15555 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S) No. 2525 of 2025 ---- Sugan Gidhi, aged about 60, Wife of Atawa Gidhi, Resident of village- Q. No. E-P/08 Kutku Colony, Abadganj, Sichai Vibhag, P.O.- Abadganj, P.S.-Medininagar, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. ...............Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Principle Secretary, Department of Water Resources Department Jharkhand, Nepal House, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Joint Secretary -cum- Director, Department of Water Resources Department Jharkhand, Nepal House, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, North Koyal Project (Uttari Koyal Pariyojna), Medininagar, Palamau, P.O. & P.S.- Medininagar, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. .............Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioners : Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Indranil Bhaduri, S.C.-IV -- 02/11.06.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs: i) For a direction upon the respondent concerned for making the payment from the months of August, 2024 up-to date of retirement i.e. 31.01.2025 and for making the first, second and third M.A.C.P. (Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme) after completion of 30 years' service and the entire arrear till date of the retirement and also the retirement benefit. . 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner had filed several representations before the concerned Respondent, but none of his representations has been considered till date; as such, the concerned respondent may be directed to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner. 2025:JHHC:15555 2 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed and it is the first date of hearing; as such, the petitioner may be directed to file a fresh representation before the 4th Respondent. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition is hereby disposed of by directing the 4th Respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision with regard to grievance of this petitioner in accordance with law and applicable Rules and Regulations by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If any claim is found to be payable, the same shall be paid to the petitioner within a further period of 4 weeks. The petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this writ petition along with its order to the 4th Respondent for early disposal of his claim. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of in the manner indicated hereinabove. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Jk