Arb. Appln. No.3 of 2025 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.02.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb. Appln. No.3 of 2025 TATA CAPITAL LTD. By its Legal Manager, D. Kalaiarasan .... Applicant vs. Shahul Hameed Naina Padakasseril Mannancherry, Landmark- Mannancherry, Alappuzha Kerala 688 538. ... .... Respondent For Applicant : Ms.M. Usha Nandini - - Earlier, this Court had appointed the applicant's own employee as a Court receiver to execute the warrant of commission. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant would now submit that the vehicle, which is the subject matter of this application is not traceable and therefore, the warrant of commission could not be executed. 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No.3 of 2025 3. In view of the said fact, no useful purpose would be served, if this application is allowed to be kept pending. Accordingly, this application is disposed of, by granting liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle, which is the subject matter of this application, as and when the vehicle is traceable. 03.02.2025 vsi2 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No.3 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. vsi2 Arb. Appln. No.3 of 2025 03.02.2025 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis