Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11252 (CHH)

NEELKANT DHRUW v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/270/2025 · 2025-03-17

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12502-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 270 of 2025 1 - Neelkant Dhruw S/o Shri Jantu Ram Dhruw Aged About 43 Years R/o Village- Bakulahi, Gram Panchayat, Dhourabhatha, Bhatapara, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, C.G. 2 - Bhagwati Prasad Dhruw S/o Shri Rangu Ram Dhruw Aged About 50 Years R/o Village- Bakulahi, Gram Panchayat, Dhourabhatha, Bhatapara, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, C.G. 3 - Netram Ram Dhruw S/o Shri Sudha Ram Dhruw Aged About 44 Years R/o Village- Bakulahi, Gram Panchayat, Dhourabhatha, Bhatapara, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, C.G. 4 - Prashant Dhruw S/o Shri Mangalu Ram Dhruw Aged About 43 Years R/o Village- Bakulahi, Gram Panchayat, Dhourabhatha, Bhatapara, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, C.G. 5 - Ishwar Prasad Dhruw S/o Shri Gunat Ram Aged About 44 Years R/o Village- Bakulahi, Gram Panchayat, Dhourabhatha, Bhatapara, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bhatapara, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, C.G. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.03.19 10:41:51 +0530 2 4 - Tehsildar Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, C.G. 5 - Director Directorate Of Industries Udyog Bhavan Ring Road No. 01, Telibandha, Raipur C.G. 6 - District Trade And Industries Center Baloda Bazar District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, C.G. 7 - Real Ispat And Energy Private Limited Village Bakulahi, Gram Panchayat Dhourabhatha, Bhatapara, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailendra Shukla, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 17.03.2025 1. Heard Mr. Shailendra Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate for respondent / State. 2. The present application has been filed, praying for following relief :- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kinldy be pleased to allow this application and the original copy of ANNEXURE P/2, ANNNEXURE P/3, ANNEXURE P/4 and ANNEXURE P/5 filed in Writ Petition (PIL) No-4/2025 mawy be returned after depositing the photocopy pf the same, in the interest of justice.” 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to confusion at the time of hearing, the counsel could not point out and prayed for return of original documents. This is a bonafide mistake and therefore the same may be condoned and the documents Annexure P/2 to Annexure P/5 filed in Writ Petition (PIL) No-4/2025 may be returned to him, otherwise the petitioners would suffer irreparable damages. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the documents appended in this application. 5. Accordingly, this application stands allowed. 6. Original copy of the documents annexed in the Writ Petition (PIL) No-4/2025 may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioners after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet