APHC010129482019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5684/2019 Between: 1. M TIRUMALAIAH, S/O. M.CHANDRIAH, AGE 41 OCC AGRICULTURE, DOOR NO.12-82, SRINIVASANAGAR, M.R.PALLI, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTURE DISTRICI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. C I, M.R.PALLI POLISTATION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, M.R.PALLI. TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. K RAMA SUBHA REDDY, S/O. RAMALCRISLINA REDDY, D.NO.19-44-S/4, RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, TIRUPATI 6. N MALLIKARJUNA REDDY, . S/O. N.SUBHA EDDY, PLOT NO.202, SRI SAI APPORTMENT, NEW INDIRA NAGAR, TIRUPATI URBAN. 7. N GIRIDHAR REDDY, S/O.N.RAMACHANDRA REDDY, FLAT NO.501,PADMAVATHI NILAYAM APARTMENTS, NARAYANAPURAM, TIRUPATI. . 8. P SRINIVAS REDDY, S/O. JAYARAMI REDDY. K.S.AGRAHARAM. CHITVEL MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the 4th respondent in not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 10-2-2019, is highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and also violative of the judgment rendered by the Honble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs State of U.P and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents herein to register a case against the petitioner's complaint dated 10-2-2019 and investigate into the matter and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent- No.4 to register a case against the petitioner complaint dated 10- 2-2019 and. investigate into the matter and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M HEMALATHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR HOME (AP)-15516/AP/15516/2017e 3. CH VENKAT RAMAN 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5684 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Smt. M.Hemalatha, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the sole petitioner in the case is no more and hence, the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 09.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5684 of 2019 Date: 09.09.2025 PSA