Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11251 (KAR)

KUMARI SUNITA BY LRS 1) SURENDRA AND ANR v. SHARANAPPA B LRS 1) SMT ANNAPURANAMMA AND ORS

WP/202686/2022 · 2025-06-02

M I Arun

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2784 WP No. 202686 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.202686 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1) KUMARI SUNITA DEAD BY LRS., SURENDRA S/O CHAINGROUP GODWAT, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR. 2. MAHEK S/O SURENDRA GODWAT AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT R/O SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A. M. NAGRAL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1) SHARANAPPA BY LRS., SMT.ANNAPURANAMMA W/O LATE SHARANAPPA AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD AND AGRI, R/O HOSAHALLI, E.J., VILLAGE TQ. SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-586101. 2. SMT. MALLAMMA W/O BASAVARAJ, AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD AND AGRI, R/O HOSAHALLI, E.J., VILLAGE TQ. SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-586101. Digitally signed by VARSHA N RASALKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2784 WP No. 202686 of 2022 3. VENKOBA S/O LATE SHARANAPPA, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O HOSAHALLI, E.J., VILLAGE TQ. SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-586101. 4. GOPAL S/O LATE SHARANAPPA, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O HOSAHALLI, E.J., VILLAGE TQ. SINDHANUR, DIST. RAICHUR-586101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R.J.BHUSARE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT SINDHANUR DATED 13.07.2022 ON I.A FILED BY THE PETITIONERS IN EP NO.163 OF 2014 VIDE ANNEXURE- G AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE SAID I.A NO. 8. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) This writ petition pertains to the suit schedule properties in O.S.No.198/1998 wherein the plaintiff therein had agreed to purchase the suit schedule properties from the defendant therein. The petitioners herein are the legal representatives of plaintiff in original suit and the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2784 WP No. 202686 of 2022 respondents herein are the legal representatives of defendant in original suit. The parties have arrived at a compromise and have filed a compromise petition dated 02.06.2025. The parties are present before the Court and they are duly identified by their respective counsels. They pray that an order be passed in accordance with the compromise petition. 2. The compromise petition is taken on record. 3. The judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.198/1998 stands modified in terms of compromise entered into between the parties. 4. In view of the compromise petition, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VNR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45.1 CT:SI