Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11250 (GAU)

ANITA DEY, v. M/S D/S REALTORS,

I.A.(Civil)/1763/2024 · 2025-03-23

Robin Phukan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010085102024 2025:GAU-AS:3275 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1763/2024 ANITA DEY, W/LO LATE HARU CHANDRA DEY, R/O QUARTER NO. 96/B, HILL TOP ROAD, P.S. JALUKBARI, GUWAHATI-11 VERSUS M/S D/S REALTORS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERS, SRI DEBASHISH GHOSH AND SRI SANJIB BHATTA HAVING ITS OFFICE AT A.T. ROAD, PANDAV NAGAR, GUWAHATI-12 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P ROY, JYOTISH DAS,MS P DEY,MS. V RAI,MS. P AGARWALA Advocate for the Respondent : MR G RAHUL, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER Date : 24.03.2025 Heard Ms. V. Rai, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. D.M. Nath, learned counsel for the opposite party. 2. This interlocutory application is preferred by the applicant, Smti. Anita Dey Page No.# 2/2 for implead as respondent No. 2 in RERA Appeal No. 6/2023. 3. Ms. Rai, learned counsel for the applicant submits that it is the applicant on whose complaint the RERA proceeding was initiated and that she is a necessary party and required to be impleaded as respondent No. 2 in RERA Appeal No. 6/2023. 4. Mr. Nath, learned counsel for the opposite party/appellant submits that he has no objection in the event of allowing this application. 5. Taking note of the submissions of learned Advocates of both sides, and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, this Court is inclined to allow this application. 6. Accordingly, the applicant herein shall be impleaded as respondent No. 2 in RERA Appeal No. 6/2023. Mr. Nath, learned counsel for the opposite party/appellant shall file amended cause title of RERA Appeal No. 6/2023, within a period of one week from today. 7. Ms. Rai, learned counsel for the applicant submits that necessary direction may be issued to Mr. Nath, learned counsel for the opposite party/appellant for furnishing a copy of the connected interlocutory application along with the memo of appeal. 8. Mr. Nath undertakes to furnish the same after filing amended cause title of the memo of appeal. 9. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant