Narayan Pandhari Narale v. Daivshala Narayan Narale and ors
SA/184/2025 · 2025-09-25
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11249 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11249 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 11 sa 184.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 184 OF 2025 Narayan Pandhari Narale .. Appellant Versus Daivshala Narayan Narale and others .. Respondents Shri Z. Z. Sayyed, Advocate h/f Ms. Priyanka R. Deshpande, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri Anand V. Indrale Patil, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2025.
FINAL ORDER : .
Learned counsel for the appellant tenders on record a pursis along with compromise decree passed in R.C.S. No. 468 of
2024. Both the learned counsels are ad-idem that matter is settled between the parties.
2. The statement is recorded in substantive R.C.S. No. 468 of 2024, which was for partition and possession.
3. The pursis is taken on record and marked as Exhibit 'X'. In view of the settlement of the dispute between the parties, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present second appeal. 2025:BHC-AUG:26487
2 11 sa 184.25
4. Second appeal is disposed of in view of the settlement. Decree be drawn up accoringly.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Sept. 25