Crl.O.P.No.27863 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.27863 of 2025 Asokan ... Petitioner/ A2 Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, PEW Gudiyatham Police Station, Gudiyatham, Vellore District. (Crime No.42 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest by the respondent in Crime No.42 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. Vinodh Kumar For Respondent : Mr. S. Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ****** 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.27863 of 2025 O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(A), 4(1)(C), 4(1- A)(ii) TNP (Amendment) Act 2024 r/w Section 123 of BNS in Crime No.42 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 05.04.2025, while the respondent police were on their routine patrol duty near Earakumpattu Village, they found that the accused persons were involved in illegal selling 18 nos. of Bangalore Whisky (90ml each); that on seeing the police, one of the accused fled away from the spot and the respondent police arrested A1; that upon confession of the arrested accused/ A1, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was falsely implicated in this case and he was not involved in the above said offence. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court, hence sought for anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.27863 of 2025 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police while opposing the anticipatory bail to the petitioner reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has 20 previous cases; and that the investigation of this case is pending. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the previous antecedents of the petitioner and taking note of the fact that the investigation of this case is pending, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 13.10.2025 stn To 1. The Inspector of Police, PEW Gudiyatham Police Station, Gudiyatham, Vellore District. (Crime No.42 of 2025) 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.27863 of 2025 K. RAJASEKAR, J. stn 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Crl.O.P. No.27863 of 2025 13.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis