Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11246 (RAJ)

KEDAR LAL MEENA v. STATE PANCHAYATI RAJ DEP ORS

CW/18200/2011 · 2025-05-05

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18931] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 367/2012 Kailash Devi W/o Shri Shankar Lal Gurjar, aged about 45 years, resident of Khelniya Post Khelniya Tehsil Uniyara, District Tonk (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1-The State of Rajasthan, through the Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2- The Project Director (EGS), Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department (Section 3, Narega), Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3-District Collector cum District Programme Coordinator (EGS) District Tonk (Raj.). 4. The Chief Executive Officer cum Additional Distt. Programme Coordinator(1st), Zila Parishad, Tonk (Rajasthan). 5-The Development Officer cum Programme Officer, Panchayat Samiti- Uniara Zila Parishad Tonk Distt. Tonk (Rajasthan). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18200/2011 Kedar Lal Meena S/o Shri Ramji Lal age about 44 years, resident of village and post Barriya Tehsil Karauli District Karauli (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1- The State of Rajasthan, through the Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2- The Project Director (EGS), Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department (Section 3, Narega), Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3-District Collector cum District Programme Coordinator (EGS) District Karauli (Raj.). 4. The Chief Executive Officer cum Additional Distt. Programme Coordinator, Zila Parishad, Karauli, (Rajasthan). 5-The Development Officer cum Programme Officer, P.S. Karauli, Zila Parishad Karauli, Distt., Karauli (Rajasthan). [2025:RJ-JP:18931] (2 of 3) [CW-367/2012] ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 416/2015 1. Mohan Lal S/o Shri Shankar Lal Gurjar, aged about 22 year R/o Village Khelniya Post Khelniya Tehsil Uniyara, district Tonk raj. 2. Shankar Lal S/o Shri Ramchandra Gurjar,aged about 50 years R/o Village Khelniya Post Khelniya Tehsil Uniyara, district Tonk raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, through The Principal Secretary To Government, Rural Development And Panchayti Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The District Collector, Tonk. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, zila Parishad, Tonk 4. The Block Development Officer, panchayat Samiti, District Tonk 5. The Gram Sevak-Cum-Ex-Offico-Secretary, Gram Panchayat Khelaniya Panchayat Samiti, District Tonk ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : None JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 05/05/2025 1. By way of filing these writ petitions, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 15.12.2011 passed by the respondents by which the recovery orders have been passed against the petitioners. 2. It is case of the petitioners that without affording any opportunity of hearing and without issuing any notice to them, an [2025:RJ-JP:18931] (3 of 3) [CW-367/2012] ex parte order has been passed, which has resulted in violation of the principles of natural justice. 3. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid action of the respondents, the petitioners have approached this Court by way of filing these writ petitions wherein this Court passed interim orders staying the recovery qua the petitioners and the aforesaid orders are still in currency. 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matters, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of all these writ petitions by issuing a direction to the respondents to initiate a fresh inquiry against the petitioners after providing an opportunity of hearing and pass necessary orders strictly in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 5. Till three months, the interim orders passed by this Court shall remain in currency qua the petitioners. 6. Since the petitioners as well as the respondents have remained unrepresented before this Court and they are not aware about passing of this order, let a copy of this order be sent to their residential address mentioned in the memo of cause title, for their intimation/information and compliance. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/405-407