Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11246 (JHR)

RAJENDRA DAS ALIAS RAJAN DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3358/2025 · 2025-04-29

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:12790] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3358 of 2025 ------ 1. Rajendra Das @ Rajan Das aged about – 21 Years 2. Pintu Das aged about – 22 years Both son of Visheshwar Das, all R/o Village- Chandna, P.O. & P.S.- Jarmundi, District- Dumka .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Onkar Nath Tiwary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 29-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Jarmundi P.S. Case No.61 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.51 of 2025 registered under Sections 302, 201, 435, 427 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners files a supplementary affidavit. Let the same be kept in the record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, have committed the murder of Mohan Das and caused disappearance of the evidence of murder. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been implicated in this case only because of suspicion and the fact that their brother was having land dispute with the deceased- Mohan Das. It is further submitted that another reason for suspecting the petitioners is that the petitioners were having frequent conversation over mobile phone with the deceased on the date of occurrence. It is also submitted that though charge-sheet has been submitted in this case but charge has not yet been framed. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertakes that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and that they will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 29.10.2024 as is mentioned from the impugned order. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dumka in connection with Jarmundi P.S. Case No.61 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.51 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/