ABDUL RASHID KHAN v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (GEOLOGY AND MINING) AND ORS
WP(C)/973/2025 · 2025-05-05
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11243 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11243 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 17 Regular List IN HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 973/2025 CM(2552/2025) ABDUL RASHID KHAN …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mukhtar Ahmad Makroo, Adv. Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (GEOLOGY AND MINING) AND ORS ...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Jahangir Ahmad Dar, GA.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 05.05.2025
1. While the matter was being argued, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to a Communication dated 19th November, 2024, addressed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Kupwara, to the Deputy Commissioner, Kupwara, with regard to lifting of Surplus material for development of land falling under Khasra Nos’ 75, 76, 77, 740/737/78, 804/738/78 in favour of the petitioner. 2. From a bare perusal of the aforesaid communication, it is apparent that the Deputy Commissioner has already conveyed the No Objection Certificate
(NOC) in favour of the petitioner for extraction of soil/stones to the level his land and develop it for agriculture/horticulture purposes, for the reason that the entire chunk of land will turn barren and non-productive being slop with no irrigation or scope for productivity, unless, the same is allowed to be developed/leveled and improved by way of extraction of soil/stones and clay. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in pursuance to the no objection conveyed to the Deputy Commissioner concerned, no decision has been taken by the appropriate Authority i.e., respondent no. 3, which prompted the petitioner to file the instant petition. 4. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel satisfied in case the instant petition is disposed of by directing the said respondent to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the Communication dated 19th November, 2024, mentioned supra, to which, Mr. Jahangir Ahmad Dar, learned GA, who has caused appearance on behalf of respondents on the asking of the Court, has no objection. 5. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition, at its threshold, is taken up for final disposal. Accordingly, the same is disposed of by directing the respondent no. 3 [District Mineral Officer, Geology and Mining Department] to accord consideration to the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with rules and as per law within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order along with the writ petition and annexures are made available to him. 6. It is made clear that while, according consideration to the case of the petitioner, the respondent no. 3 shall give due weightage to the recommendation made in terms of Communication dated 19th November, 2024 mentioned supra.
Let the entire exercise be completed within the
aforesaid period and the decision which is likely to be taken be forwarded to the petitioner through registered post. 7. The writ petition is disposed of along with connected CM(s) in the matter indicated above. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 05.05.2025
“Shamim Dar”