1 APHC010130042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 6750/2025 Between: 1. I MINDS ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI. MOHAMMAD JAIULABEDREN D. NO.3-4, 3-3, MAIN ROAD, NEAR YSR STATUE, SUNKARAPALEM, THALLAREVU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533464. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, TULLUR, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, KRISHNA NAGAR, RAMANAYAPETA, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 533005. 3. SUNKARAPALEM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY SUNKARAPALEM VILLAGE, TALLAREVU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, O/O DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICE SURYANARAYANA PURAM, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533001 5. DEPUTY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, O/O DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICE SURYANARAYANA PURAM, KAKINADA, ANDHRA 2 PRADESH - 533001 6. MANDAL EDUCATION OFFICER, KAKINADA URBAN, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. SRI PALIVELA RAMU, EX. SMC CHAIRMAN, MPPUP SCHOOL, SUNKARAPALEM, TALLAREVU MANDAL KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Vijay Mathukumilli, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural development and Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, Ld. Standing Counsel for the ZPPs and MPPs. 2. Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, Ld. Standing Counsel for the ZPPs and MPPs has submitted the Written Instruction along with the certain documents furnished by the Secretary, Grama Panchayat, Sunkarapalem village. Copy of it is supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. Sri Vijay Mathukumilli, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, after sifting through the Written Instruction, would indicate that the Writ Petitioner is willing to submit a fresh Representation along with all the documents. He would submit that all the required documents would be supplied to the Official Respondents within a period of two days from today. 4. Having regard to these facts, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition at the admission stage, without going into merit by 3 directing the Official Respondents to pass a Speaking Order in accordance with law with regard to the grant of NOC or otherwise within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of all the documents from the Writ Petitioner and communicate the same to the Writ Petitioner forthwith. 5. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 24.03.2025 Mnr 4 66 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.6750 OF 2025 Dt.24.03.2025 Mnr