2025:JHHC:14783 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2757 of 2025 ------ 1.Santosh Kumar Mahto @ Santosh Mahto, son of late Nepal Mahto, resident of village Kaitha, PO, PS and District Ramgarh 2.Devanand Kumar Mahto, son of Suresh Mahto, resident of village Gosa, PO Kankebar, PS Ramgarh, District Ramgarh 3.Sahbaz Anwar Goldy @ Sahbaz Answar @ Goldy, son of Anwar Nabi, resident of Kathal Mohalla, near Jama Masjid, PO Chitarpur, PS Rajrappa, District Ramgarh 4.Shivnandan Munda @ Shivandan Munda, son of Saryu Munda, resident of near Middle School, PO Barkipona, PS Rajrappa, District Ramgarh … … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Niraj Kumar Mishra, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P. ----- 04/ 09.06.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 132, 285, 122(2), 121(1), 127(2) 324(4), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of Ld. Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ramgarh in connection with Gola PS Case No. 105 of 2024. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners went to the place of occurrence to pacify the crowd and one of the petitioners also got injured because of the stone pelting. He submits that the petitioners were never involved in 2025:JHHC:14783 2 the occurrence and infact death had occurred due to involvement of police vehicle which has been suppressed by the police officials. 4. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that during investigation photographs were taken and the pen drive containing photographs suggests that the petitioners were involved in the occurrence. 5. An accident had taken place on the highway and one of the person died on the spot and another died while being treated in the hospital. Dead body was handed over to the family members and the administration also assured payment of compensation. It is alleged that the family members and the others raised slogans and blocked the main road in front of the police station and they tried to enter the police station by force and they pelted stone. These petitioners were also involved in the stone pelting and obstructing the police. 6. Considering the aforesaid material, this Court finds it not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3