Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11241 (ALL)

MUKUL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/2545/2025 · 2025-02-17

Rajeev Misra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23461 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2545 of 2025 Applicant :- Mukul Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kumar Ashutosh Srivastava,Nagendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. Heard Mr. Girijesh Kumar Srivastava, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Kumar Ashutosh Srivastava and Mr. Nagendra Bahadur Singh, the learned counsel for applicant, the learned A.G.A. for State opposite party 1. Perused the record. Applicant Mukul, who is a charge sheeted accused, has approached this Court by means of present application under Section 482 Cr. P. C. with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, Most Respectfully prayed 'ble Court may kindly be pleased to lication and expedite the proceeding of 2020 (State Vs. Mukul) arising out o 0. 598/2020 U/S 376 L.P.C., P.S. Pa Moradabad pending since 22.10.2020 Additional District and Sessions Judge/F. ad, otherwise the Applicant shall suf ole loss and injury, and/or pass such oth order which this Hon'ble Court may deem nder the facts and circumstances of the case." At the very outset, the learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant does not wish to press this application any further. It is thus urged that this application be, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Learned A.G.A. representing State opposite party 1 has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for applicant. In view of above, this application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 18.2.2025/HSM Digitally signed by :- HARI SHANKER MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad