Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11240 (UTT)

SARJEET SINGH v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

WPMS/2673/2025 · 2025-09-12

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2673 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Dinesh Gahatori, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Anil K. Dabral, Additional C.S.C. with Mr. Sudhir Nainwal, S.C. for the State. 3. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition for the reason that criminal revision would lie against the order impugned in the present writ petition. 4. Permission so sought is granted. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and certified copies annexed by the counsel for the petitioners, in the present writ petition, shall be returned back to him, as per Rules. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 12.09.2025 SK