ANJANEYA v. THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT AND ORS
WP/202091/2023 · 2025-04-28
Chillakur Sumalatha
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11238 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11238 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:2539 WP No. 202091 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.202091 OF 2023 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: ANJANEYA S/O. YAMANAPPA, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: VILLAGE BADIYAL, TQ. & DIST: YADGIRI.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVANAND PATIL, ADVOCATE & SRI. VARUN PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, COURT COMPLEX, YADGIRI BY THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (CAO),
2.
THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC COURT, COURT COMPLEX, YADGIRI BY THE CHIEF MINISTERAIL OFFICER (CMO)
3.
THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC COURT, DEPT. OF ACCOUNTS, COURT COMPLEX, YADGIRI, BY THE SHERISTEDAR (ACCOUNTS),
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHESHADRI JAISHANKAR, AGA)
Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:2539 WP No. 202091 of 2023
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER COMMAND OR ORDER OF THE LIKE NATURE AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 FOR IMMEDIATE COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDERS DATED 03.06.2019 & 07.07.2021 OF THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC YADGIRI VIDE ANNEXURE-A & A1 AND FURTHER ALSO DIRECT FOR COMPLIANCE OF
ORDER DATED: 04.07.2023 IN O.S.NO.106/2012 OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIRI VIDE ANNUEXURE-B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)
Learned counsel for the writ petitioner Sri.Varun Patil submits that the writ petition might have become infructuous. The writ petition is filed in the month of July- 2023 and till now office objections are not complied. No reasons are put forth as to why the petitioner did not choose to comply the office objection till now.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:2539 WP No. 202091 of 2023
This Court does not find any grounds whatsoever to adjourn the matter. Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (Dr.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE
VNR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1 CT:NI