SURENDRA NATH RAI AND 107 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/20460/2024 · 2025-02-12
Neeraj Tiwari
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 112359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20908 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20460 of 2024 Petitioner :- Surendra Nath Rai And 107 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Pandey,Vidya Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners want inclusion of their training period towards qualifying period of 19 years with additional increment while working on the post of Sub-inspector.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy is no more res integra in view of judgment of this Court in the case of Ghanshyam Tiwari v. State of U.P. and Others (Writ A No. 44330 of 2013) decided on 7.9.2012, which has come to affirmed in special appeal, against which Special Leave Petition has also been dismissed. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the matter can be decided in accordance with law provided all the petitioners make their individual representations. In view of above, l dispose of the writ petition with direction to the petitioners to make their separate individual representation before competent authority, namely, respondent no. 2 annexing therewith copy of the judgment in the case of Ghanshyam Tiwari (supra) within a period of four weeks from today and in the event any separate representation is filed by each of the petitioners, the same shall be disposed of by means of reasoned and speaking order within a further period of two months.
Order Date :- 13.2.2025 AKT Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad