[2025:RJ-JP:37053] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9673/2002 Lakhan Singh son of Shri Geetam Singh, aged about 35 years, resident of Village Aatoos, P.S. Sikandara, District Agra (U.P.) (presently posted in the office of respondent No.4). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. 2. The Inspector General/ Director General, Central Industrial Security Force (Ministry of Home Affairs), Block No.13, C.G.O's Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003. 3. The Deputy Inspector General (Training), Central Industrial Security Force, (Ministry of Home Affairs) Block No.13, C.G.O's Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003. 4. The Principal/ Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, R.T.C. Deoli, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.P. Mathur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 11/09/2025 1. Perusal of the record reveals that when the matter was listed on 29.04.2011, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner and the following order was passed:- "The final order of penalty inflicted upon the petitioner is under challenge. List before regular Bench." 2. Again, when the matter was listed on 27.02.2019, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner and the following order was passed:- "Office is directed to show the name of Mr. C.S. Sinha, Adv. in the cause list. List this writ petition again on 09.04.2019." [2025:RJ-JP:37053] (2 of 2) [CW-9673/2002] 3. Again, when the matter was listed on 10.09.2025, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner and the following order was passed:- "No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. In the interest of justice, one more opportunity is granted. List the matter tomorrow i.e. 11.09.2025." 4. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 09.03.1999, whereby in exercise of powers conferred under Rule 29-A, Schedule-II, read in conjunction with Rule 31(d) of the Central Industrial Security Force Rules 1969, the pay of petitioner Lakhan Singh reduced from Rs.3,425/- to Rs.3,350/- for a period of two years with effect from 09.03.1999 and the said order was assailed by the petitioner in appeal and the appeal was dismissed vide order dated 11.10.1999. 5. From the order-sheets of the case, it reflects that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present writ petition, therefore, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file an application for revival of this writ petition, if the cause of action still survives. 7. Other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /16